Enumerating AppDomains in a remote process


I am working on adding a support for ASP.NET performance counters into Musketeer. Compared to other .NET performance counters they have quite surprising instance names. ASP.NET developers decided that their performance counter instances will be identified by names derived from the AppDomain names (more information can be found here). This is probably due to a fact that one process may host multiple ASP.NET applications, thus one counter instance per process won’t be enough. Consequently, in order to match collected metrics with process ids we need to know which AppDomain belongs to which process. How can we do that?

Continue reading

.natvis files and type templates in WinDbg


When we work with binary data we often use the dt command to group the bytes into meaningful fields, eg.

0:000> dt ntdll!_PEB @$peb
   +0x000 InheritedAddressSpace : 0 ''
   +0x001 ReadImageFileExecOptions : 0 ''
   +0x002 BeingDebugged    : 0x1 ''
   +0x003 BitField         : 0x8 ''
   +0x003 ImageUsesLargePages : 0y0
   +0x003 IsProtectedProcess : 0y0
   +0x003 IsLegacyProcess  : 0y0
   +0x003 IsImageDynamicallyRelocated : 0y1
   +0x003 SkipPatchingUser32Forwarders : 0y0
    ...

The problem arises when the library owner does not provide type information in the symbol files. We are usually left with a manual decomposition of the bytes in a binary editor (010 Editor has a nice template system). Wouldn’t it be great if we had some template system available also in the debugger? I have some good news for you: with the latest release of WinDbg we received a very powerful feature: .natvis files. There were even two Defrag Tools episodes dedicated to this functionality: Defrag Tools #138 and Defrag Tools #139. Let’s first analyze how the .natvis files are built, to later use them in our binary data analysis.

Continue reading

!injectdll – a remote thread approach


In the last post I presented you my first WinDbg extension with a !injectdll command. Theoretically everything was correct, but after some more testing I noticed that the command is not always working as expected. Andrey Bazhan was pretty quick in pointing this out and advised me to use a remote thread, which, as you will see, is a much better approach. But let’s first have a look at the problems in lld 1.0.

Continue reading

!injectdll – a WinDbg extension for DLL injection


Today I have a pleasure to present you my first WinDbg extension lld 🙂 For now it contains only one command: !injectdll, which allows you to inject a DLL into the process being debugged. There is a similar command in the sdbgext extension, but it works only for 32-bit processes. The usage is extremly simple – just remember to load the extension in the correct bitness (32-bit version for 32-bit processes). Example session may look as follows:

0:000> .load lld
0:000> !injectdll c:\temp\Test.exe
ModLoad: 00000001`3f820000 00000001`3f924000   c:\temp\Test.exe
ModLoad: 000007fe`fd960000 000007fe`fd98e000   C:\Windows\system32\IMM32.DLL
ModLoad: 000007fe`ff410000 000007fe`ff519000   C:\Windows\system32\MSCTF.dll
(bac.5a0): Break instruction exception - code 80000003 (first chance)
ntdll!LdrpDoDebuggerBreak+0x30:
00000000`778c7800 cc              int     3

The binaries can be found under the release tab of the source code repository.

Continue reading

Diagnostics Kit released!


For some time I have been working on a monitoring solution for developers. Today I have a pleasure to announce its first official release. It is a set of tools which should help you better diagnose your applications. As there are many monitoring solutions on the market you may be using one of them (and that’s great). However, I’ve observed that it’s still uncommon for developers to collect application logs in one place. Therefore OPS monitor IIS logs and developers are checking application-specific targets. This is not the best approach as you can’t see at first sight if something is going wrong with your application. Few years ago I had an idea of an application board which will show statuses of applications on all the servers. This is one of the central part of the Diagnostics Kit and I named it the Diagnostics Castle. A sample board might look as follows:

diaggrid

Continue reading

TLS 1.2, AES-GCM and .NET network trace


The next exercise on our path to better understand TLS will be a decryption of a network trace collected from a .NET console application. In the last post we examined a simple TLS 1.0 session. Today I would like to focus on the latest version (1.2) of the TLS protocol. The changes introduced by this version (defined in RFC 5246) included: support for authenticated encryption, PRF simplification and removal of all hard-coded security primitives.

Continue reading

Manually decrypting an HTTPS request


Recently I have spent some time on learning the internals of HTTPS. I wanted to know what makes it secure and how the communication actually looks like. Today I would like to show you the steps required to decrypt a sample HTTPS request. Imagine you got a .pcap file recorded by one of your company clients who complains that your application returned 500 HTTP status code with a strange error message. The client forgot to copy the error message but luckily had a Wireshark instance running in the background (I know it’s highly hypothetical, but just close your eyes to that :)) and he/she sent you the collected traces. Let’s then assume that your server has a certificate with a public RSA key and you are in possession of its private key. Finally the client was using a slightly outdated browser which supports TLS 1.0 (though I will inform you what would have been different if it had been TLS 1.2) and does not use ephemeral keys. My main point in writing this post is to present you the steps of the TLS communication. This post is not a guidance on how to create a secure TLS configuration, but a walk-through on how this protocol works and I will purposely use less secure ciphers to make things easier to explain.

Continue reading

New features coming to minidumper


Some time ago Sasha Goldstein wrote on his blog a post about a new open-source tool he created: minidumper. The idea is great and allows you to create more compact memory dumps for .NET processes. I completely agree with Sasha that most of the time when you are working with .NET processes memory dumps you are focused on .NET memory heap. All native elements are usually not necessary and take a lot of space in dumps. Having said that, I need to admit that there were times when those native parts were invaluable in my diagnosis, such as diagnosing native memory leaks (when using pinvoke) or handle leaks. But those are quite rare and in such situations we have no choice but to use the full memory dumps. For all other .NET problems you are welcome to use minidumper. If you are interested in minidumper internals there is another post on Sasha’s blog which explains them very well.

Continue reading

Hidden catch when using linked CancellationTokenSource


Today’s short post was inspired by a recent memory leak in Nancy. I thought it’s worth to describe it in detail as the reason why the memory was leaking was not so obvious and many of us could commit the same mistake as Nancy authors. The leak was present in the NancyEngine class, which is the central point in the Nancy request handling process. In other words: each request served by the Nancy application must pass through this class instance. NancyEngine processes the requests asynchronously and accepts as a parameter a CancellationToken instance – thus making it possible to cancel the request from the “outside”. At the same time it uses an internal CancellationTokenSource instance which cancels the current requests when the engine is getting disposed. As you see there are two cancellation tokens involved and the HandleRequest method needs to respect their statuses. For such an occasion there is a method in the CancellationTokenSource class in .NET Framework which creates for you a special “linked” CancellationTokenSource that will depend on values in the related tokens. From now on you don’t need to worry about the other tokens as whenever they get cancelled your linked token will become cancelled too. With this introduction the prologue of the HandleRequest becomes clear:

Continue reading